![the chorus line 1985 dancers the chorus line 1985 dancers](https://images.genius.com/8ec326e49039a00a580bf244cd23a267.493x493x1.jpg)
Warm, authoritative, ugly-handsome, effortlessly real, with a sense of intelligence behind his acting and his dancing. In fact, in the charisma department, “A Chorus Line’s” one real killer is Terrence Mann as Larry, Zach’s assistant choreographer. Douglas looks like “glower, 10 dance, 0.” Reed never has the pure line of white-hot intensity, in her singing or dancing, that would separate a star from a chorus girl. Some actors, most notably Roy Scheider in “All That Jazz,” could move so that you believed them as dancers. Unfortunately, they are not the film’s most charismatic couple. She is still his protege who has gone on to be his star and has then dared to reach for stardom “in a Hollywood musical.” (In what, “Flashdance”? “Staying Alive”? Did no one tell her about “Hollywood musicals” during the past decade?) Now back, desperate for any job, her new number, “Let Me Dance for You,” is interrupted by a look at their past lives together: Cassie rehearsing dejectedly, joined in an embrace by an equally morose Zach (I think it symbolizes a romance out of sync). The Cassie/Zach (Michael Douglas) love affair of the near-past has been built up. In Arnold Schulman’s adaptation of the James Kirkwood-Nicholas Dante book for the show, we remain pretty much rooted in the Mark Hellinger Theatre, although we do roam upstairs and downstairs and even, in a moment of the purest irrelevance, follow Cassie (Alyson Reed) via helicopter shots as her taxicab speeds toward it. We don’t see plain little girls becoming beautiful “At the Ballet,” or go with a flat-chested one for a whole new set of equipment for “Dance, 10 Looks, 3" (the lady in question here may have stumbled into a half-price sale). To Attenborough’s credit, he has not meandered out of the theater and into flashbacks in the lives of his desperate dancers. Every chance we have at momentum or empathy is sabotaged by casting, by cutting away (even whacking off the dancers’ feet) or, in one mysterious case, by a little trip the camera takes up to the blackness of the ceiling and back down again as a number is being performed. In the famous final number, “One,” you can see a hint of his style, but everything else has the stamp of Jeffrey Hornaday, who perpetrated the “Flashdance” vulgarities. Bennett’s choreography has been all but erased. The film is virtually the same length as the play but it travels in fits and starts. A clean bill of health from their dentist or podiatrist might be more to the point.īut most of all, “A Chorus Line,” performed without intermission, had an urgent coherence and its choreography was crisply elegant.
![the chorus line 1985 dancers the chorus line 1985 dancers](https://c8.alamy.com/comp/A14JTW/a-chorus-line-1985-richard-attenborough-A14JTW.jpg)
Such was Bennett’s assurance that it hardly ever occurred to us to question just why the innermost secrets of their lives needed airing when they were simply going to be chorus members, good and true. The distance from our theater seat to the stage was also Bennett’s ally, as 16 auditioning singer-dancers confided snatches of autobiography to Zach, an omnipotent and unseen choreographer at the back of the theater. And if we saw through it, we agreed to let ourselves be manipulated emotionally: It was, in effect, what we did for the love of the theater. That was a secret well disguised by the exuberant theatricality of the original production, conceived, choreographed and directed by Michael Bennett and produced by Joseph Papp.
![the chorus line 1985 dancers the chorus line 1985 dancers](https://c8.alamy.com/comp/A14JTR/a-chorus-line-1985-richard-attenborough-blane-savage-A14JTR.jpg)
In this stately and fairly slavish representation, directed by Richard Attenborough, what pokes through with the pain of a broken bone is how thin the material really is.
![the chorus line 1985 dancers the chorus line 1985 dancers](https://i.pinimg.com/236x/34/10/d3/3410d3433b00df77339bc7e7c50825eb--as-val-a-chorus-line.jpg)
If you’ve never seen the stage piece, you may come out wondering what in the name of goodness all the fuss was about 10 years ago (and even now, since it is still playing at the self-same Shubert Theatre in New York). If you were one of that legion who saw “A Chorus Line” more than once in the theater, the film is enough to make you doubt your judgment. “A Chorus Line” is here at last (selected theaters) and on its trip has gone from champagne to Champale.